Hey trader,
Institutions bought bullish option structures in IBIT, MARA, and MSTR today. Three tickers, one underlying bet, and all of it points at Bitcoin setups.
The Console flagged every one of them inside the same session. That’s where the easy part ended.
Flow tells you where the money went. It doesn’t tell you which of the three setups actually pays you, and that was the call I had to make before the close.
So how do you separate them?
I ranked them on the gamma structure sitting above each price and on what the options actually cost.
That knocked out the name with the most short squeeze potential. I landed instead on a vertical spread I could buy for 38 cents.
I’m going to walk you through every number behind that decision.
Three Tickers, One Underlying Bet
The Console pulled IBIT, MARA, and MSTR into the same session today. All three saw institutional buying on the call side.
IBIT took 13,000 contracts. One print near the ask ran 7,000, 6,800, and 6,000 contracts in the 46 calls for September 25th, sitting at a 35 delta.
MARA showed a roll. They sold the 12s and bought the 12.50s for next week’s expiration, somewhere between 23,000 and 40,000 contracts.
MSTR came through as a series of long call verticals for next week. A long call vertical means buying one strike and selling a higher one against it, which caps the payout and cuts the cost. I counted 136 against 142, 140 against 146, and 139 against 144.
Every one of those names moves with Bitcoin. MSTR buys Bitcoin and holds it. IBIT seeks to invest in Bitcoin directly. MARA mines it.
That’s three ways to express one idea. I only wanted one of them.
How I Separate These Bitcoin Setups
I rank these on two things. The first is the gamma structure sitting above the current price, and the second is what the options actually cost me.
Gamma structure tells me how much runway a breakout has before dealers stop helping. Where institutions bought calls, dealers are short those calls and have to buy stock as price rises, which accelerates the move.
That acceleration stops where the selling starts. On MSTR, a break through 136 pushes price quickly to 142. Above that, the selling picks up between 142 and 146.
So MSTR gives me a move from roughly 136 to 145. That’s not a big move.
MARA has more room. They’re rolling into 12.50 with 26,000 contracts seven days out, which raises the wall there and builds a bigger accelerator if 12.50 breaks.
Break 12.50 and the next accelerators sit at 13. Another 2.50 puts you at 14.50. Another 3.50 puts you at 15.50.
MARA also carries 28% of its float short with a short ratio of 1.95 days. The ratio stays low because MARA trades heavy volume right now, which lets it absorb a covering rally.
On gamma exposure and technicals alone, I favor MARA over MSTR. The upside squeeze potential is simply greater.
Where the Pricing Changed My Answer
MARA won the structure test. It lost on price.
The MARA play for next week is buying the 13 call at $0.30. I’d normally sell something above it to cut that cost, and the 14.50 strike goes for six cents.
Six cents doesn’t reduce my basis in any meaningful way. That leaves me paying full freight on a naked long call.
IBIT let me build the same directional bet cheaper. It’s sitting in a bull flag, which is a tight consolidation after a sharp advance.
The flag hasn’t broken yet. Measured from the low to the high, that prior leg ran 30%, which projects to roughly 55 or 56 on a breakout above 46.
Call volatility there runs 37.5, 38, 39, and 40 as I move up the strikes. Skew rising into the strikes I want to sell works in my favor.
The Trade I Took
I bought the 45/47 call vertical in IBIT for next week’s expiration. Here’s the full structure.
- Setup: IBIT consolidating in a bull flag under 46, with institutional call buying in the 46 strike for September 25th at a 35 delta
- Trigger: A break above 46, with 45 and 47 both reachable by Monday
- Target: $2.00 at expiration if price bursts to 47, though I’d look to sell closer to $1.20 before the Fed statement
- Edge: Rising call volatility skew into the short strike, and an upside that dwarfs the fixed downside
- Cost: $0.38
- Max risk: $0.36
The math on that is straightforward. Selling at $1.20 against $0.37 of risk gives me $0.83 of gain, which divides out to a 224% return.
I want to be clear about the other side. This spread can readily go to zero next week, and that’s the entire downside.
I’m risking 36 cents against a shot at more than a dollar. That asymmetry is why I took IBIT over the name with the better squeeze profile.
What I’m Watching Next Week
None of this works without a breakout. IBIT was fading as I put the trade on, and the flag has not resolved.
You can wait for the break above 46 and enter after confirmation. That costs you some premium and removes a lot of guessing.
Next week brings the Fed statement and plenty of volatility around it. I’ll be watching whether those dollars coming out of the Treasury market keep finding their way into Bitcoin.
Today I ranked three names on gamma structure and pricing, then put 36 cents at risk on the one that priced right. That’s a repeatable process. It runs on seeing the prints before the chart makes anything obvious.
That process is what I built the 90-Day Block Hunter Challenge around.
You get the Block Hunter Console scanning hundreds of names for hidden pressure, 2 to 3 block alerts a week, one high-upside setup every Friday, plus the live Masterclass and 12 weeks of mastermind sessions with me.
Recent Block Hunter reads include SILJ +392%, PLUG +222%, NKE +142% and GDX +72.5%.
The next 90 days start now, and your seat is protected by a full 30-day money-back window.
👉 Join the 90-Day Block Hunter Challenge
Brandon Chapman, CMT
Creator of Ghost Prints
